User talk:SkyObserver

Welcome, SkyObserver

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

• Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
• To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
• Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
• These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
• The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
• Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
• Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
• See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

---

  Interstellar Shipping & Trading Co. 15:26, 9 November 2013 (EST)

Bad Dragon

Excuse me SkyObserver, I saw what you did there and just wanted to say: "Do you mind? We have standards here."

I appreciate that you're trying to contribute, but enough is enough with Bad Dragon and related articles. I'm not sure if you have a personal vendetta against them, or if you just have a hard-on for furries, but either way, this isn't your personal blog where you get to swing your dick around and shit on everyone without a purpose. In other words: be funnier and less like this article.

★ D. Baggins ★

07:32, 4 February 2014 (EST)

• Not sure if the last messsage got in. but yeah, sorry, i hope it wasn't too much trouble.

I was just trying to be very thorough. The page now, is rather bland, but the layout is way cleaner looking.

I thought it was a very odd coincidence of ED going down the last couple days. I was worried it was being DDOS'd or somehow attacked. Was it really a scheduled maintainance? Or that BadDragon was threatening you guys?

SkyObserver 12:29, 6 February 2014 (EST)

It was a very odd coincidence. But no, it really was just maintenance. And yes, I agree the article is fairly bland right now. However, I would rather have a bland article than a childish, blatant attack article. I've written three articles in my day, two of which—this one and this one—were featured. Try taking a look at them to see the differences in how they're written and how Bad Dragon is written. I welcome you to continue working on Bad Dragon; just be prepared for your edits to be altered if they don't quite meet the ED standards. I'll try my best to keep your work. But, don't be discouraged! Everybody starts somewhere, and you're on the right track! D. Baggins ★ likes this. 14:12, 6 February 2014 (EST)

• Formatting is one thing. But the dox need to stay. The person specific sections need to stay. These people are not like the other individuals featured on ED. They actually CAN and will obstruct, threaten, and have more than enough resources and contacts to attack ED, and make these changes to protect themselves.