Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Talk:The Donald

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Dancing Spiderman at 05:06, 3 July 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Encyclopedia Dramatica endorses The Donald. reply 12:30, 1 March 2016 (EST)

POTUS AND PEDOBEAR

time to completely rewrite this page?--Neurogeezer 21:49, 1 March 2016 (EST) Doesn't he deserve a pedobear approval seal for his banging hot daughter who he'd have to date first in order to boink if she wasn't his daughter? --Neurogeezer 19:48, 20 March 2016 (EDT)

These articles and the whole concept of the split is stupid and isn't even being done right

By ED standards this article is neutral either delete the anti trump article or make this one actually pro Trump Wiiztec 23:31, 9 September 2016 (EDT)

No. Uberfukken 23:40, 9 September 2016 (EDT)
I agree; there should only be one article, but why should it be pro-Trump? He deserves to be slandered and made fun of like everybody else. -- Ihat3niggers 08:23, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
If you want to sperg out, go edit Donald Drumpf. The Donald is for pro-trump meme magic. -  (Al Gore) 08:36, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
This is a fucked up situation. There is no way to make everyone happy, or if there is someone please suggest it. --Mantequilla (talk)   12:12, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
My two-cents' worth: leave them as is at present, there's no hurry, and let events unfold naturally - in the fullness of time events will dictate or at least shape any choice/s that might have to be made. Also there's the precedent of two pages on Obama, pre- and post-2008. No-one's in a hurry to rationalize them and the place doesn't seem to have suffered as a result. Sidecar 19:06, 9 November 2016 (EST)

dead gif

  --Morris 11:01, 23 October 2016 (EDT)

so many tags

i get it, it's to mimic the wikipedian habit of slapping big ugly tags at the top of everything, but come on. -hipcrime   13:28, 9 November 2016 (EST)

agree - am removing the israel tweet from the top, as it doesn't seem to deserve such prominence. should help. Sidecar 13:48, 9 November 2016 (EST)
done, have also removed a deck from the achtung box. is that a little better? possibly the rosie quote could be moved to her page, but unsure so will leave that to others to decide. Sidecar 13:53, 9 November 2016 (EST)

More salty tears

Ivo Robotnik 16:05, 9 November 2016 (EST)


Reverted

Oddy, I reverted your last edition "GOOD JOB INTERNET! WE MEMED A RETARD INTO THE WHITE HOUSE!" it's false, has a bitter tone more than an ironic or triggering one, it's pretentious and doesn't go with the rest of the article...in fact, it'd go way better as header of the Drumf article --Chzoronzon 17:02, 9 November 2016 (EST)

AOTN

make it aotn for like a fucking week and pepes / trump memes galore too

-  (Al Gore) 01:06, 10 November 2016 (EST)

My two cents: AG is right. This isn't just an upset, this is a developing shitstorm of a story and isn't over yet. It'll die down soon enough but let's make hay while the sun shines. Sidecar 06:51, 10 November 2016 (EST)
I love a good salty shitstorm pouring from butthurt anti-Trump voters. Ivo Robotnik 12:20, 10 November 2016 (EST)
Go for it, milk it for all it is worth imho. --Mantequilla (talk)   12:43, 10 November 2016 (EST)
What would really be the cherry on top of all this would be if Trump gave Nigel Farage a job, as Farage has obviously been angling for one with his recent toadying. Perhaps Ambassador to Brussels? I'd spoog till I dropped. Plus, with those boggly eyes and weird mouth, he'd make a fantastic Pepe. A man can dream.... Sidecar 12:54, 10 November 2016 (EST)
We should host Donald Drumpf too. I don't get why we have to deal with this guy for 8 more years but he's not getting any ED hate. Mike the Great (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2016 (EDT)
Personal opinion: Satire works best when it punches upward rather than kicking downward. At the moment, the liberal political and media elites of the civilised world are in disarray and dismay, because they wrote him off and mocked him, and so Trump's victory is the 'punch upward' for the time being. When Trump comes massively unstuck or makes himself look a total dick (and he will) then the 'punch upward' goes for him instead and that's the time for frontpaging Drumpf. I'm not the fucking Pope though, so feel free to call me a pretentious cunt and ignore everything I've just said. Sidecar 14:13, 10 November 2016 (EST) EDIT TO ADD: And I'd forgotten that the pro- and anti-Trump articles each have a link to their counterpart near the top, so it's not like either is getting buried.

Well said --Chzoronzon 14:53, 10 November 2016 (EST)

Or, crazy idea, the internet-saavy 20-something males that tend to edit here get echo chambered into not hearing the fact that not just half the majority, but a vocal enough half to get out and vote supported him unironically or we wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. No matter how you slice it, half of Americans love trump and need to be mocked. I'm not digging on this article at all, but it wouldn't be right to not dunp as much hate as possible on the world's current single most famous figure. Mike the Great (talk) 21:27, 10 November 2016 (EDT)
Is this place about teaching moral lessons to its editors then? I must have misread the T&Cs. My reasoning here is most of the world is disgusted by what has just happened, therefore we get out the marshmallows on sticks. The 'offended' page exists for a reason. Anyways, I'll shut up now. Sidecar 16:45, 10 November 2016 (EST)

Chimpouts

Enjoyable section, but think it would be more at home as part of the 2016 Presidential Elections article, where it would fit nicely with the growing catalog of liberal butthurt, downpage. Any seconders for this motion? Sidecar 17:40, 11 November 2016 (EST)

Just me, then. Sidecar 06:27, 13 November 2016 (EST)

Women's March on Washington

How are a group of anti-Trump bitches going to stop Donald Trump on the day he runs the white house? Might want to keep an eye on them and add a dose of lulz for the internet to see. Ivo Robotnik 19:56, 15 January 2017 (EST)

Someone needs to make a page specifically for the inagrenation and all drama relating to it -  (Al Gore) 06:37, 25 January 2017 (EST)

Jesus

In case anyone's wondering, that Trump/Jesus pic is doing the rounds on twitter and appears not to be intended ironically. Sidecar 04:46, 25 January 2017 (EST)

Lag

There are too many videos being rendered on the page. Can someone just list some of the video gallerys as links or some shit? -  (Al Gore) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (EST)

Templateful

Why has this article suddenly got top-heavy with templates again? We went through this before (see above) and agreed it was A Bad Thing. Sidecar 19:27, 4 April 2017 (EDT)