User talk:DarthBotto

Welcome, DarthBotto

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

• Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
• To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
• Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
• These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
• The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
• Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
• Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
• See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

---

Mr Jonzz 14:15, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

sup bb?

Are you affiliated with GNAA at all? Just curious. Also sorry for drunkshitting on your page. Mike the Great (talk) 01:22, 4 October 2012 (EDT)

Had to look it up what that stands for. Nope, I can't say that I'm gay, a nigger or associated with anyone, really. Why are you curious? DarthBotto _talk•cont 06:50, 04 October 2012 (UTC)

lol over done then. And who said It was me in the video, goronchev only tried to prove one comment in his video about me, and it wasn't very explainable, nor is his explaination about lying about some girl named Lesli he thinks didn't exist. Lazasrus

Nobody said any one particular editor was Benos. However, the text sure has looked like somebody is really proud of themselves. Really, the only thing I'm interested in is keeping the page in good shape. Since I created it back in 2007, it's gone through periods of high and low, but lately, it's been looking a little sloppy.

Mr Wiki Pro

I noticed you left a question on an admin's talk page but never received an answer to it, so I'm gonna field it for ya.

The article you mentioned is indeed subpar in its current state, and the author is a lying dirtbag for not keeping his word on expanding it. But the goal here is to *add* content to the wiki, not remove it. By keeping that article around, maybe someone, someday will actually turn it into an acceptably informative piece of dramatic greatness. By deleting it, we'd be removing that possibility.

Yeah, it's written from a bit of a whiny perspective atm, but it's not a shitty attack article, and thus doesn't qualify for that type of removal.  Sickpuppy  11:54, 18 July 2014 (EDT)

Removing templates

Hey dumb shit, if you thought the page should have been deleted, then you shouldn't have removed the fucking template. Kackerack 05:26, 14 August 2014 (EDT)

No, I removed the template from the article and proceeded to clean it up. ^reply 05:43, 14 August 2014 (EDT)