Talk:Sethisto

Why there is the need of dox on this guy?

Because it's always fun for people to have them - BPS --BPS 17:38, 11 January 2012 (CET)

i think ill remove the dox, and leave only the e-mail, i fail to see any extreme faggotry or whining to deserve the dox online.

Oh no you don't --Typhoon 19:58, 11 January 2012 (CET)

lol aight, but i fail yet to see why dox this fag afilthyjew

i would attribute that to his numerous attempts to purge everything about himself from the internet, other than "this nice little guy who runs a pony website". He attempted to hide his dox, only to get a streisand effect, as well as went around removing certain forum posts about his dragon obsessions. Additionally, he is a disgusting pedophile and all who live near him should be aware of his perverse ways. ♥♥♥ 20:40, 13 January 2012 (CET)

So we can troll the fuck out of him, stupid. Lord Tony 00:04, 12 January 2012 (CET)

Essentially, yes. ♥♥♥ 21:28, 13 January 2012 (CET)

U mad? u seem mad.afilthyjew

Why would I be mad? Your trolling attempt makes no sense. Lord Tony 21:27, 13 January 2012 (CET)

Even ponyfags agree that he's a cunt. The article should go a little bit more in-depth on Equestria Daily though. Alanthewhite 04:26, 1 February 2012 (CET)

The page was originally on EqD, the issue is that there's not enough to write about the site alone other than "lol they jack off to horses" ♥♥♥ 04:31, 1 February 2012 (CET)

add "lol they're furries" and you have an article! ☭⚡⚡ 18:42, 1 February 2012 (CET)

A suggestion

I think we should separate equestriadaily and sethisto, after all, now its not just him who's owns the website.Williamcll 04:29, 2 April 2012 (EDT)

^ volunteer

The problem is that most of the bronies don't exactly align their views with the stinging cynicism of ED because it might hurt somebody's feelings or some faggot autism shit. If there were somebody who was capable of writing in an acceptable tone for an entire article, it may get done, but the EDiots here don't know enough about Equestria Daily, it might would get done, but most pony fags just throw fits over on their respective articles rather than contribute to ED. Mike the Great (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2012 (EDT)

Read above, this started as an eqd page and there just wasn't enough content. ♥♥♥ 15:30, 2 April 2012 (EDT)

I have a better suggestion. Fan art of Sethisto taking it up the ass by his pony waifu Trixie. Ivo Robotnik: SnooPING AS usual I see! 00:05, 19 June 2014 (EDT)

Why?

[1] Just... why?--HyperPeanut 23:56, 12 April 2012 (EDT)

What the fucking fuck Mike the Great (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

Is this even fucking legal? Did Hasbro really give them permission to sell such faggotry?--HyperPeanut 02:32, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

Probably not. Maybe. I doubt they'd give the permissions for anything they didn't make, because they can't control the (obviously horrific) quality. 02:53, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

So basically you play as Cereal's ponysona, going on a deletion rampage on any submission that isn't Trixie clop material. In other words, it's just Sethisto's daily routine made into a shitty flash game.--HyperPeanut 03:54, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

Right now the game is rated 1.9, but it's only a matter of time until the herd catches wind and starts vote/rating spamming until it's winds up on the front page.--HyperPeanut 04:03, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

Can you show where it's sold? ALso is Trixie a pony? If they're making money with the likeness of a character, then I'd be happy to file the complaint to Hasbro for the glory of Mother Lulz, but it is required that they actually violate the law and for Hasbro to care for anything to get done, and for that they'd need to be making money. Also, the more ratings/exposure it gets from his users, the more ratings/exposure it gets from GameFAQs, and seeing as to how its shit, it won't get a high rating. The one authorized review it got was lucrative when it gave it a low score. Mike the Great (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

I can't show where it's sold because I don't have an iPhone. I did some research on the developer, as it turns out it's just 3 e-begging high school kids. They claim that they're not making any money off this, but from what I've heard the game's not free. Well either way, this shouldn't be there without Hasbro's permission and I'm not so sure that they would approve of something like this being distributed by a licensed developer using their brand, even if it is non-profit.--HyperPeanut 05:00, 13 April 2012 (EDT)

Well I just got my iPhone. Turns out the game is free, but just as I thought it's a steaming pile of barely controllable crap.--HyperPeanut 23:29, 17 April 2012 (EDT)