User:SkyBlueCat3/Drafts/Closing Logos

Note that Receptards can be slaves to Encyclopedia Dramatica. Revert their shit that may count as "vandalism" or you can remove the cringest parts added

THIS PAGE IS BEING WATCHED BY ENEMIES OF THE LULZ. BEWARE OF BUTTHURT REVISIONISM.

This wiki's anthropophobic community is a sausage fest of autistic pseudo-intellectuals, so you can't say anything bad! :-( Be aware of that, you insensitive fuck.

The most biased current name and logo. Atleast they've admitted being a dumbass at running their own wikis.

Reception Wikis are dependent autism-ridden wikis combined with an easily-offended, ineffectual, anorexic, anthropophobic as fuck community that "reviews" every shit for a living. So, the wikis are for people to create an article to list out their opinions, right? Then add at least 100 dumb opinions that no one cares about. This is so that nerdraged basement-dwellers of these websites will never stop bitching around for months and constantly yell "OMG, THE GAME'S GRAPHICS FUCKING SUCK", "THE MODERATION OF THE PLATFORM IS GAY" and "THE QUALITY IS BAD" like their unintelligent idol that they never stop praising, proving that it is possible to make a living without having a life. Scientific research has shown that being possibly both mentally-retarded and pseudo-intellectual has culminated in the creation of these limitless wikis and also the Receptards.

Only because you made everything bad in purpose, you could cause a tsunami-wave of thirteen-year old autistic anthropophobic fanboys attacking you and creating an article in a desperate attempt to piss you off in no time; they will also downvote you for making your point cause none of them doesn't have one.

What is Reception Wikis?

The wikis usually revolves around gaming, television shows, musics, websites, characters, and movies, which has two seperates for wikis on what's good and what's bad. The wiki article for Reception Wikis said that it's "based on both website reviews and user reviews". These were likely from IMDb, Twitter, or mostly their ineffectual microscopic braincells to think of shitty opinions to add in the articles.

On the website, you are met with a poorly-designed main page, that you don't know where the fuck are you supposed to go through. The design of these wikis were probably made by random faggots who probably have their eyes covered in cum while coding CSS to add solid colors; supposedly made in a notepad on their broken-ass computer with 4gb RAM. 

While you're on this wiki, waiting for something to update, you will likely see this typical-normie who never shut the fuck up on our wiki for months. It's because he's among the desperate people who want to die alone like their dyslexic fans visiting Reception Wikis in their spare time. When clicking the announcement, you will be redirected to a new page, Qualitipedia, a new rebrand of Recepdicks Wiki with a name given in a completely biased way (See above for more if you haven't already, dumbass).

How to make an article

• First, you can start with quotes coming from those infamous ranting-whores regarding your subject.
• You must start with an introduction about the subject; this is basically a Manual of Style rule in most wikis, so that everyone will know what is it about.
• Add the section "Why it Sucks", then write out 100 opinions from apeshits with a brain tumor who bitch about it. Drugs is highly recommend for everyone who wants to take this whole step.
• Remember to do research the reason why it sucks. Almost 80% of these articles have never done this.
• Add a "Trivia" that no one cares about because it's totally boring.
• The very last step is to add Jewtube videos from Pseudo-intellectuals of The Ranting Community.

Wikis

Here's all of the wikis they've made out of the shithole. A little known fact that these wikis weren't actually made from scratch, they were likely made from AIDS cattered in semen. This, of course, should be noted that it's not all about opinions, it's about being unoriginal with a lack of creativity in ideas for a wiki, therefore, leading up the community from being severely autistic or cowardly Thanatophobia-feared retard to both.

• Awesome and Crappy Games Wiki: Wikis cattered with AVGNtards. These users are ugly, selfish, basement-dwelling, worthless cunts with a collective intelligence that came from AVGN's shithole.
• Best and Terrible TV Shows Wiki (2015) - Reception Wiki's second dick, a mentally-retarded wiki with the exact same quality as MysteriousMrEnter's reviews.
• Greatest and Awful Movies Wiki - Same as the above, a wiki that bitch everything because how "cheesy" it was.
• Best and Horrible Music and Songs Wikis - a stupid, cock-socking, cancerous wiki that doesn't contribute anything to the Reception Wikis. This wiki doesn't know what's bad and what's good, and just because the song is annoying and overrated doesn't mean you fucking autistic children would create an article for it. Because of how much cancerous these wikis actually was, One of the receptards, NicholasTheVideoMaker2005 restored up the cancer-ridden Horrible Music wiki back to life.

The Outcast Network

Moar Info: The Outcast Network

This shitwork was awarded for having the most 13-year-old boys turned into desperate.

Looks like the edgetards stepped in for the spotlight - The Outcast Network a.k.a The Anti-social Network was made in a desperate attempt to troll Reception Wikis thinking they were going to be the first wikis to act mentally-retarded, but we know who was in. This network was founded by Seanbuscus2600 and Mar9122, who both had developed a method to be as annoying as possible to make the immature spregs mad over their stupidity. However, The Outcast Network, was a full whiney as fuck community that didn't know how to use insults in a creative way, which means that these faggots started importing their stuff into Encyclopedia Dramatica; all of which are basically just typical TL;DR articles that makes you think that you're not the only dumbass who can't create a good article.