Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Don Murphy: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
imported>TMZ
No edit summary
imported>Hipcrime
Reverted edits by TMZ (talk) to last revision by Meepsheep
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:I want you.png|link=This user is a Donny Long sockpuppet]]
[[Image:Don Murphy.jpg|right|thumb|Don Murphy.]]
{{banned|exhibiting signs of GRIDS}}
'''Don Murphy''' is [[an hero]] of [[TOW]].
==See also==
 
*[[Donny Long]]
 
[[Category:Disease]][[Category:Doxed Individuals]][[Category:Dying Alone]][[Category:Faggotry]][[Category:Fellatio]][[Category:Gay Porn]][[Category:Penis]][[Category:Rage]][[Category:Sex]][[Category:Taking Down ED]][[Category:Whores]]
 
The story starts out when Don Murphy gets an article on TOW. When he finds out he has an article, he begins [[an hero|doing it for the lulz]], by creating a forum and telling his henchmen to vandalize his page. While doing so, he has published [[dox]] of the following users:
 
*[[HighInBC]]
*[[Riana]]
*and many more!
 
== Quotes ==
{{quote|Wikipediots
Members of the Cult of Wikipedia
 
 
If Wikipedia is so wonderful a project why does nearly everyone in positions of power insist on anonymity?
 
If I worked for the Encyclopedia Britannica as an editor or author then I'd put it front and center on my resume. I'd tell prospective clients and customers. I'd tell my family about it. I'd tell my former teachers. I'd put it on my weblog under my real name. I'd do this knowing that EB would stand right behind me to check and validate my scholarship against allcomers.
 
What is it about Wikipedia that causes the exact opposite psychological response? Because editing and adminning Wikipedia is nothing to be proud of, because Wikipedia is an affront to education, to scholarship and to the Enlightenment that spawned the notions of universal education from which the encyclopedic nostrum began.
 
Because to be associated with Wikipedia is not to be associated with some high moral principle but the very opposite - of the promotion of venality, political power games, historical revisionism, moral and intellectual cowardice and the promotion of the notion that a confluence of the opinions of ignoramuses constitutes an eventual path to Truth.
|---JohnA's Wikipedia Review, [[Truth|telling it like it is]]}}
 
{{quote|she tried to make her page private but I got screen caps of everything including her blogs about the cats
Happy Birthday Aug 24|Don Murphy is a pervert}}
 
== See also ==
*[[Stephen Colbert]]
*[[An hero]]
 
== Links ==
*[http://www.donmurphy.net/board/showthread.php?t=21925 The forum in question. Troll for great justice]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ColScott User page on TOW]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Murphy Article. Vandalize for great justice]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ColScott Talk page. Troll for great justice].
 
{{wikipedo}}
<br>
{{crapstub}}
[[Category:Wikipedia Vandalism]]

Revision as of 08:30, 1 November 2018

Don Murphy.

Don Murphy is an hero of TOW.


The story starts out when Don Murphy gets an article on TOW. When he finds out he has an article, he begins doing it for the lulz, by creating a forum and telling his henchmen to vandalize his page. While doing so, he has published dox of the following users:

Quotes

   
“ 		 
Wikipediots

Members of the Cult of Wikipedia


If Wikipedia is so wonderful a project why does nearly everyone in positions of power insist on anonymity?

If I worked for the Encyclopedia Britannica as an editor or author then I'd put it front and center on my resume. I'd tell prospective clients and customers. I'd tell my family about it. I'd tell my former teachers. I'd put it on my weblog under my real name. I'd do this knowing that EB would stand right behind me to check and validate my scholarship against allcomers.

What is it about Wikipedia that causes the exact opposite psychological response? Because editing and adminning Wikipedia is nothing to be proud of, because Wikipedia is an affront to education, to scholarship and to the Enlightenment that spawned the notions of universal education from which the encyclopedic nostrum began.

Because to be associated with Wikipedia is not to be associated with some high moral principle but the very opposite - of the promotion of venality, political power games, historical revisionism, moral and intellectual cowardice and the promotion of the notion that a confluence of the opinions of ignoramuses constitutes an eventual path to Truth.
 

„
  		 

—---JohnA's Wikipedia Review, telling it like it is

   
“ 		 
she tried to make her page private but I got screen caps of everything including her blogs about the cats

Happy Birthday Aug 24
 

„
  		 

—Don Murphy is a pervert

See also

Links

Don Murphy is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.


This article is a crappy stub. You can help by completely re-writing it. Be sure to make it longer, girthier, and more pleasurable.
Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=Don_Murphy&oldid=50460"