User:SkyBlueCat3/Drafts/Closing Logos

Reception Wikis are dependent autism-ridden wikis combined with an easily-offended, ineffectual, anorexic, anthropophobic as fuck community that "reviews" every shit for a living. So, the wikis are for people to create an article to list out their opinions, right? Then add at least 100 dumb opinions that no one cares about. This is so that nerdraged basement-dwellers of these websites will never stop bitching around for months and constantly yell "OMG, THE GAME'S GRAPHICS FUCKING SUCK", "THE MODERATION OF THE PLATFORM IS GAY" and "THE QUALITY IS BAD" like their unintelligent idol that they never stop praising, proving that it is possible to make a living without having a life. Scientific research has shown that being possibly both mentally-retarded and pseudo-intellectual has culminated in the creation of these limitless wikis and also the Receptards.

Only because you made everything bad in purpose, you could cause a tsunami-wave of thirteen-year old autistic anthropophobic fanboys attacking you and creating an article in a desperate attempt to piss you off in no time; they will also downvote you for making your point cause none of them doesn't have one.

What is Reception Wikis?

The wikis usually revolves around gaming, television shows, websites, characters, and movies, which has two seperates for wikis on what's good and what's bad. The wiki article for Reception Wikis said that it's "based on both website reviews and user reviews". These were likely from IMDb, Twitter, or mostly their ineffectual microscopic braincells to think of shitty opinions to add in the articles.

On the website, you are met with a poorly-designed main page, that you don't know where the fuck are you supposed to go through. The design of these wikis were probably made by random faggots who probably has their eyes covered in cum while coding CSS to add solid colors; supposedly made in notepad on their broken-ass computer with 4gb RAM. This proves that reading and seeing the such most AIDS-cattered articles and designs should be illegal for good reasons.

While you're on this wiki, waiting for something to update, you will likely to see this typical-Lunix normie who never shut the fuck up on our wiki for months, it's because he's among the desperate person who wanted to die alone like their dyslexic fans visiting the website in their spare time. Basically, why are you even the only miserable faggot that doesn't want to get butthurt in this article. Enough with the butthurt already, When clicking the announcement, you will be redirected to a new page, Qualitipedia, a new rebrand of Recepdicks Wiki with a name given in a completely biased way (See above for more if you haven't already, dumbass).

A little known fact that these wikis weren't actually made from scratch, they were likely made from AIDS cattered in semen.

How to make an article

• First, you can start with quotes coming from that infamous ranting-whores regarding your subject.
• You must start with an introduction about the subject; this is basically a Manual of Style rule in most wikis, so that everyone will know what is it about.
• Add the section "Why it Sucks", then write out 100 opinions from apeshits with brain tumor who bitch about it. Drugs is highly recommend for everyone who wanted to do this whole step.
• Remember to do research the reason why it fucking suck. Almost 80% of these articles never have done this.
• Add a "Trivia" that no one cares about because it's totally boring.
• The very last step is to add videos from Pseudo-intellectuals of The Ranting Community.