Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Ilana Angel: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sonicdeehedgehog
No edit summary
imported>Sonicdeehedgehog
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
Ilana Angel is an incredibly stupid individual. It's not clear whether she knows she's lying or if she actually believes in what she is saying. But here is a clear case of her deliberately misleading her moronic readers.
Ilana Angel is an incredibly stupid individual. It's not clear whether she knows she's lying or if she actually believes in what she is saying. But here is a clear case of her deliberately misleading her moronic readers.


Have you ever seen an article posted on your Facebook feed and make up your mind about it just based on the title only to find out that it was a complete misrepresentation of the actual article? That is exactly what Ilana did with her 2014 blog titled "LeAnn Rimes threatens Brandi Glanville." [http://www.jewishjournal.com/keepingitreal/item/leann_rimes_threatens_brandi_glanville]
Have you ever seen an article posted on your Facebook feed and made up your mind about it just based on the title only to find out that it was a complete misrepresentation of the actual article? That is exactly what Ilana did with her 2014 blog titled "LeAnn Rimes threatens Brandi Glanville." [http://www.jewishjournal.com/keepingitreal/item/leann_rimes_threatens_brandi_glanville]


Naturally, any person who reads the words "LeAnn Rimes Threatens..." would assume that LeAnn Rimes threatened somebody. Why wouldn't you? And if you actually read the blog, you will continue to think that she did alllll the way until paragraph SEVEN when Ilana writes "While it wasn't Ms. Rimes who sent threats, she supported it by saying nothing." Excuse me? So it WASN'T LeAnn Rimes who threatened someone?
Naturally, any person who reads the words "LeAnn Rimes Threatens..." would assume that LeAnn Rimes threatened somebody. Why wouldn't you? And if you actually read the blog, you will continue to think that she did alllll the way until paragraph SEVEN when Ilana writes "While it wasn't Ms. Rimes who sent threats, she supported it by saying nothing." Excuse me? So it WASN'T LeAnn Rimes who threatened someone?

Revision as of 06:47, 23 November 2015

Do you know who Ilana Angel[1] is? Most people don't but if you do, I'm so sorry.

To make a long story short, Ilana Angel is a mentally deranged cyber bully who is employed by JewishJournal.com[2]. She has delusions of grandeur where she believes that country singer, LeAnn Rimes[3], is obsessed with her and speaks negatively about her on a daily basis. In reality, LeAnn Rimes has blocked Ilana Angel on Twitter and has had her lawyers issue cease and desist orders because Ilana likes to make up wild stories (aka LIES) about her without ever providing a source or shred of evidence. Ilana Angel has also stalked LeAnn Rimes by breaking into her concerts and has had to be escorted out by police on more than one occasion.

Naturally, Ilana Angel will have critics but she has a very thin skin. When people criticize her ethics and lack of morals, she attacks them by posting their private information in her JewishJournal.com blogs in order to encourage her "troops" to harass them and get them fired from their jobs.

Many have contacted JewishJournal.com with their stories about how Ilana Angel has been abusive but JewishJournal.com responds by either saying nothing or blocking the individual.

JewishJournal.com features a number of respected writers who actually went to school to learn journalist integrity. Something Ilana Angel knows nothing about. She often tells her readers she is drunk while writing her blogs. She commonly has numerous spelling mistakes and her grammar is atrocious.

Ilana proves what a liar she is in her own articles

Ilana Angel is an incredibly stupid individual. It's not clear whether she knows she's lying or if she actually believes in what she is saying. But here is a clear case of her deliberately misleading her moronic readers.

Have you ever seen an article posted on your Facebook feed and made up your mind about it just based on the title only to find out that it was a complete misrepresentation of the actual article? That is exactly what Ilana did with her 2014 blog titled "LeAnn Rimes threatens Brandi Glanville." [4]

Naturally, any person who reads the words "LeAnn Rimes Threatens..." would assume that LeAnn Rimes threatened somebody. Why wouldn't you? And if you actually read the blog, you will continue to think that she did alllll the way until paragraph SEVEN when Ilana writes "While it wasn't Ms. Rimes who sent threats, she supported it by saying nothing." Excuse me? So it WASN'T LeAnn Rimes who threatened someone?

That's right. Ilana instead talks about this nameless Twitter individual who "suggested Ms. Glanville kill herself and the people who said it were then sent messages of love from Ms. Rimes." Okay...so where is the...ya know....THREAT??? Telling someone they should kill themselves is not a threat. A "threat" is saying "I'm going to kill you." And that was never said in any shape or form. But how do we even know this was said in the first place? Ilana provides ZERO quotes from the individual and she provides ZERO evidence that LeAnn Rimes ever "liked" their mean spirited post.

But she doesn't stop there. She finishes out her blog by saying "Brandi Glanville needs to not only watch her back, but seriously consider the safety of her children while they're in the care of a woman who supports threats against her." What Ilana is suggesting is that LeAnn Rimes is a dangerous individual who could potentially inflict physical harm to Brandi Glanville AND her CHILDERN! ....WHAT???? She has provided ZERO evidence of a threat, ZERO evidence LeAnn Rimes EVER condoned a threat, and jumped to the conclusion that Ms. Rimes is a homicidal maniac.

All of this was brought to the attention of JewishJournal.com and they refused to comment.

50 by 50