Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Talk:Pikacat39: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Shoopdawoop6
No edit summary
imported>Shoopdawoop6
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:16, 3 March 2013

If she discovers this article

Watch as she discovers this article about herself, shit brix, then try sock puppet wankery and blank the article. Then we can troll her socks and vandalize her pages with kittens :D. -Faggot Bystander 23:50, 4 October 2012 (EDT)

I wonder if this is right.

   
 
I'm not going to leave a 14 year old girl's address up on a page cause some dipshit got mad at her and made an article. But if you dress up like a fox and wear diapers and then take pictures of it? That's fair game, sir
 

 
 

—Garrett

Do we really care if some faggot is mad at an 11 year old? TylerRosenow 00:33, 5 October 2012 (EDT)

  • To clarify: it would be different if she had done this to herself - like the DON'T CALL ME A HOMO kid, but I feel conflicted about this one. TylerRosenow 00:35, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
  • same. the 11 year old claim looks unlikely to me tho. perhaps that is hyperbole. the article mentions "lover"s. unlikely for a child. -hipcrime 18:18, 5 October 2012 (EDT)
"It's more likely than you might think..." - Uncle Jimmy 18:26, 4 November 2012 (EST)

This article

Is about another one of those Deviant Art whores, who is about 11 years old, and thinks she is lesbian. Therefore, she goes out and dates an overly large amount of people. Personally, I believe it needs more content. There isn't much to laugh at currently. Now, if the girl starts stealing, it will be hilarious. We just need something to laugh at other than her failed relationship attempts.--UsmellLiekButt~Shoopdawoop6 10:16, 3 March 2013 (EST)