Talk:Kimmy

Sooo like, is this the new ED? --TROLAHOAR (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2014 (EDT)

She isn't even hot.How many fuckin pictures do we need of this slut?--Boudica 00:11, 13 November 2014 (EST)

Moving a few of these to talk page because we do not need a million images of her. DO NOT WANT

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Boudica (talk • contribs)

I've restored the images for the time being as it were pics that brought about her notoriety. Input is welcome.  VX  • 03:25, 13 November 2014 (EST)

I thought it went well with the article having pictures of her showing who she is and what she is about. And Kimmy was never about her being hot. Articles can't have several pictures that go along with the article? Carlosthegreat 01:45, 14 November 2014 (EST)

When 70% of your article is images, that's just shit.--Boudica 15:51, 14 November 2014 (EST)

What's your deal man, why is this a fight? The last revision I did not add any pictures, simply changed 2 to the ones I wanted with the article I wrote. Point taken, not adding more images, but it would be nice if you'd let me get the ones I want with the article on there. Carlosthegreat 20:31, 14 November 2014 (EST)

Ok.Thank you for understanding.Just plz do not add any more pix--Boudica 22:35, 14 November 2014 (EST)

The images aren't hurting anything (except the nudes, I am wondering what her opinions on those are), stop being a fucking kike boudica. Carlos you can add as many images as you'd like. --Mantequilla (talk) 12:07, 23 November 2014 (EST)

I haven't touched that page in over a week--Boudica 15:13, 23 November 2014 (EST)

Doesn't matter, don't tell ppl not to add constructive edits to articles. --Mantequilla (talk) 23:41, 23 November 2014 (EST)

Yeah, I think the housewifey pics are relevant cause they document the inner/truer fantasies of anon, and the backlash against bitchy female roles...but the porn pics aren't particularly interesting...I'd cut those in half--Chzoronzon 18:48, 7 January 2015 (EST)