- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Talk:Shit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Baleet or rewrite
This looks like an article from Uncyclopedia. It needs to be completely rewritten or canned. Attila the FUN 21:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- No I say keep it as is. It serves it's purpose well, that is being a shit article about shit full of shit. If any article needs to be deleted for being like Uncyclopedia it's Fat Larry's Band.--Shitfacedcockmasta 15:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Most people always fail to realize that Fat Larry's Band is something that keeps ED from turning into Uncyclopedia. It keeps articles about old good/shit bands with ABSOLUTELY NO INTERNET relevance from being written. I'd rather see all the 60's-70's-whatever bands be reverted to Fat Larry's Band than see hundreds of repetitious articles beginning and ending with stupid unfunny and predictable cliches like "X sucked balls" or "Moar like THE FAG FOUR! (amirite)." A fine example of this fail is the Elvis Presley article. Unconstructive yet ironic shit articles like this one and Fat Larry's Band help keep away the cancerous real shit articles. Depravo 04:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck no we shouldn't rewrite this! It's short, sweet, simple, and serves its purpose well. It's not supposed to be well-written, it's not supposed to be remarkable, it's supposed to be "shit." I'm putting the "perfect" tag back. Schlangemeister 01:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Most people always fail to realize that Fat Larry's Band is something that keeps ED from turning into Uncyclopedia. It keeps articles about old good/shit bands with ABSOLUTELY NO INTERNET relevance from being written. I'd rather see all the 60's-70's-whatever bands be reverted to Fat Larry's Band than see hundreds of repetitious articles beginning and ending with stupid unfunny and predictable cliches like "X sucked balls" or "Moar like THE FAG FOUR! (amirite)." A fine example of this fail is the Elvis Presley article. Unconstructive yet ironic shit articles like this one and Fat Larry's Band help keep away the cancerous real shit articles. Depravo 04:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Not everything necessarily has to have INTERNET relevance. Plenty of article subjects have been generating lulz and/or drama long before the internet. That has just made pre-existing lulz and drama easier to spread. Thomas Paine has an article for God's sake. No name 10:16, 22 July 2011 (CEST)
- Everything on ED should have some Internet relevance. That is another thing keeping us from becoming Uncyclopedia, we are not content free. --zaiger (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2013 (EDT)
Shit Happens Article Needed!!!
Shit happens all the time when it comes to wikimedia foundation and its free "encyclopedia" wikicrapia but shit happens all the time in the world in any culture in any tradition in any language. We can have have exploring shit happens from everywhere!!! Fucksimplewikipedoia (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2021 (EDT)
- Shit nobody cares about --
Conciërge Kaptein-Commandant Tabs æ✎࿕♛ 21:28, 7 August 2021 (EDT)
- Shit nobody cares about --