File talk:Dbaggins - Too Gawd Stupid To Even Remember What He Wrote.png

I kept the 3D printer section in my latest revision. So do you care to explain what exactly it is you're accusing me of? ~ Dbaggins aka Dildo B. 04:16, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

I'm not "accusing" you of anything, I'm pointing out the fact that you openly admitted that you DID NOT READ the sections in question and that the only reason you even want them removed is because they're "too long" for you to read. --Onideus 04:17, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

When I said it was "tl;dr" I meant that other users would not be bothered to read it. I myself did in fact read it. Perhaps you should've sought clarification before jumping to such a hasty conclusion ~ Dbaggins aka Dildo B. 04:20, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

Best to avoid him baiting you in talk pages. Remember that you're speaking to a 40 year old who wears diapers. NAMBLA membership is unconfirmed. He can't be reasoned with. 04:25, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

And Schnookums continues to flail about with personal attacks. LOL --Onideus 04:33, 9 June 2013 (EDT)

Oh, I see...so it's not what you said it's what you ~mean~ that counts...because we're all supposed to be mind readers here to babysit you. *nods*

Apparently now his "argument" is that ~other~ people might not read it because it's too long...so then...why the fuck does it need to be removed, Sparkles? Hurr de durr! Essentially you're accusing *ALL* of ED's user base of being as unintelligent/illiterate as you are, which represents the ~entire~ gamut of your OPINION on why you don't want it in the article.

...yeah...ya know, I've got ~another~ theory...you're a gun control advocate and you're butthurt about those sections specifically because they rip apart your personal beliefs, which is why you want them removed so badly (despite your claims that no one will even read them anyway). *nods*

--Onideus 04:33, 9 June 2013 (EDT)