Talk:Boxxy

My opinion

Fuck Boxxy, Rita is better. DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS. --Equivamp 02:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

June 17th: She's back

Looks like those shitty /b/ posters were right after all. ~ Eco 16:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

• Link??? --zaiger (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
  • NM I got it
    --zaiger (talk) 16:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

    Fuck, her videos are getting worse.

    Meepsheep

    16:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

    August 21st: Another new video

    It just isn't the same anymore and the intro just kills it. Eco 17:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

    I made a cock shoop of that thumbnail. Looks like she's sucking her own dick. Lazarus

    December 11th and 23rd: 3v3's trollin'

    You could already tell something's wrong, just by checking the description. (Catie is quite a modest person.)

    And that's it, 3v3 hits the fan! Oh lawd, feels like i broke a few ribs laughing. For serious now, this shit can cause massive damage to the internet if used properly (rickroll your friends to this to get them vomiting; extra points if executed on pregnants). And somebody please write a good section about it if you give a damn cause i'm such a faggot. --Zheldor651 11:29, 26 December 2011 (CET)

    
    Seriously, this needs a section BADLY. --Gseed 01:39, 27 December 2011 (CET)

    Is Boxxy a man?

    

    Outdated Article Version?

    The following images were apparently ~in~ the article at one point, but now they're just orphaned files with no article. So I'm wondering if they were ~purposefully~ taken out of the article (not likely), or maybe it's cause the version of the article that was restored wasn't very up to date.

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    Anywho, I'll leave it to everyone else to decide if they should be put back in or not. --Onideus 10:13, 12 July 2013 (EDT)

    Article Restoration

    45 images checked, 6 images restored to their original 10/5/2009 versions. --Onideus 10:13, 12 July 2013 (EDT)

    A Missing But Not Missing File

    

    This image was in the 2009 version of the article...but now it's not in the article...nor is there any reference to it on the server anymore at all. It's possible it might have been deleted I suppose, but not too likely. --Onideus 10:18, 12 July 2013 (EDT)