Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

User talk:The New Mikemikevs

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>The New Mikemikevs at 07:22, 27 July 2011. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Welcome, The New Mikemikevs

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

  • Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
  • To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
  • Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
  • These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
  • The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
  • Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
  • Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
  • See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

H64 11:40, 24 July 2011 (CEST)

Hi

Rather than just blocking you, I will give you a change to make that into a decent article. 11:42, 24 July 2011 (CEST)

Thanks! I shall try. I notice you are aware of the affront to human decency that is Mathsci.[1] The New Mikemikevs 11:47, 24 July 2011 (CEST)
Yeah I have known about him for quite some time. 11:48, 24 July 2011 (CEST)
I'd try to lengthen it. Try adding quotes and AN/I logs. 16:41, 24 July 2011 (CEST)

I do plan to move it, but it still needs a little work. 06:10, 25 July 2011 (CEST)

Yep. 10:23, 26 July 2011 (CEST)

Mathsci

Is there any proof that he is who he says? Or could he be another Essjay? 19:32, 26 July 2011 (CEST)

Jewnius Thadeus

" wikipedia:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Spencer195/Archive – This is how I first learned of Mikemikev and Mathsci. Spencer195 was an inactive sysop account that the Race and Intelligence group cracked into. As it turns out, Mikemikev wasn't actually involved. The cracking is the reason behind the desysopping of inactive sysop and why they wish to expand the powers of bureaucrats. I'll make a Spencer195 article when I have the time; ED needs an account of that shitstorm. "

"I then learned from one of Mathsci's WR posts that Mikemikev posted a personal army request on Stormfront. Mikemikev's comments on Jews sums up the conflict between him and Mathsci. I haven't done an research into their dispute beyond that. --JuniusThaddeus 03:04, 27 July 2011 (CEST) "

Interesting. This is exactly the kind of paranoid speculation I was complaining about in the Mathsci article. I had never heard of Spencer195 up until now, and there is no "Race and Intelligence group" that I am aware of, and I have never been involved with hacking. Mathsci's WR post is mostly fiction, most of the accounts he claims are me I have never heard of. Any new account expressing any "right wing" sentiment is labelled a "sock of mikemikev", the mindless admins often towing the line. You seem to get most of your data about me from Mathsci, is that gonna paint a reliable picture? A relevant post from WR:

"One of the annoying features of Wikipedia is that there are so many marginalized people there that it's a virtual certainty that, for any dispute, there is someone on both sides of it who can be used to tar his or her codisputants with guilt by association. Experienced Wikipedians do this without even thinking very hard about it." "One of the many reasons that sane people simply avoid Wikipedia entirely."

The truth is that I was involved in R and I as an individual because I find the hereditarian arguments compelling. Actually I have submitted an empirical test to resolve the issue as a research proposal to the university of london. I happened to post at Stormfront because I noticed a disproportionate number of Jews arguing for "no differences", which is clearly notable, and which I find suspicious given the well known Jewish confidence in their own superiority. This doesn't actually make me a dyed in the wool Nazi, and I am not.

"Mikemikev's comments on Jews sums up the conflict between him and Mathsci." This is really the biggest misconception in the piece. I guess you would like to paint me as a drooling anti semite and file me away. If you actually read my article it is almost entirely about Mathsci's behavior as an individual, and is accurate. Check out the Wiki logs for confimation. This is not "because Mathsci is Jewish" at all. In fact one of the participants in R and I who opposed Mathsci was Jewish, Captain Occam, and I found him very reasonable and regularly agreed. Sure I take a few digs at Mathsci's jewishness, the horror!

It's funny that anybody who criticises a jew, even in passing, is part of the neo-nazi conspiracy, even on ED.

Put this back in, it's funny!