Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/2

Headswap

^Would appreciate some help on this. I'm pretty sure it can grow. - Vinland 12:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

• Has potential, I'll add an image gallery.-- --Person123 22:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Much appreciated. Will help out soon. - Vinland 01:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

FOX hacked

Rumor has it an anon is responsible. More news at 11. - Vinland 01:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

EPIC WIN!--SadMonkey 02:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20067801-71.html – It may be fake. --JuniusThaddeus 02:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Ironically, that was probably the only way to get FOX to broadcast some truth for a change. - Vinland 14:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

I think, coupled with the recent PS3 hacking, that this is drawing a lot of attention on us. Don't be surprised if there will be some kind of legal crackdown. --One With The Lulz 11:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Baaa.

- Vinland 15:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

So that's how meepsheep was born. Equivamp 22:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thats even worse than goatse.... M R S K W I D 21:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Meme Wars

I've created an article about a meme game, it looks promising, we should get him some promotion, as it will be released free.--Polmas 16:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Planning on making this a VOTN

It exposes how awful Mac OS X's functionality is.

PræsidentMudkip 06:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

weiner again

http://www.weiner.house.gov/issue_display.aspx?id=844

fucking irony

--Kashiwaba Tomoe 04:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

How Can One Remove The Thumbnail Template

Once a full version has been uploaded? Or is it automatically done at some point?

--Onideus 06:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I do believe you can edit the page and remove it. - Vinland 12:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Tried that, but it triggered the "article blanking" response. --Onideus 19:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

It's not a response; it's the automatic edit summary for whenever one blanks a page without providing an edit summary. You weren't reverted by "MysteryBot" or anything. I believe that image descriptions are cached or something, so it'll take a while for your changes to appear. --JuniusThaddeus 20:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it worked for me here --One With The Lulz 20:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Favicon

Guys, when are you going to set classical æ as favicon? --Deimos ^talk 17:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

• Doesn't it already have an æ as a favicon? --MilanorTSW 14:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
  • No, the current pass http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Favicon.png is empty. --Deimos ^talk 14:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

wat

wat - Vinland 21:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion

On ED's birthday,which I don't know when the fuck it is, you guys should change the website background color for the day.just sayin'.

Well hello there.

Senators want a crack down on Bitcoin. I smell a raid. - Vinland 03:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

flag this as child abuse for the lulz

and rate it down while you're at it--Brxbrx 18:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

inb4NYPA, I suppose--Brxbrx 18:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. -YellowZombieHater 10:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

AOTN related shit

I think we should have an AOTN every 2 days rather than every day, otherwise we would eventually run out of good AOTNs to display

PræsidentMudkip 00:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

• Or we could start making more good articles Ninja 16:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Or we can fix the existing shit, so it could qualify as a good article. --MilænorTSW 18:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm with the second idea; I propose we also use a category to pool completed/presentable articles in, considering this wiki's circumstances. That way you can distinguish them from the ones that still need cleaning up/work. - Vinland 21:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Agree with Vinland --TKN 21:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

I am down for both ideas. We use to do it every other day on the old wiki and it worked fine, and we def need to make categories for [[Category:GNA]] and [[Category:BNA]] (though I think there is already a category BNA), but we will really need to keep up with them. --zaiger (talk) 21:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

We need a quick or tiny guide regarding how to 'clean up' an article, regarding its appearance and missing pictures. It doesn't have to teach adding actual addition/changes to the lulz currently within it. That would help more people fix articles faster. - Vinland 00:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, and red-linked images should be moved to their respective article's talk pages. --zaiger (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

We should indeed have some category for outstanding articles.--EmilyPlays 17:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Newest British butthurt

Some Brits interpret bureaucratic shit to mean Obama wants to give the Falklands back to Argentina. Not only are the Britfags upset but so are the teabaggers for Obama "ruining" the manipulative, Israeli-like alliance with the UK. --One With The Lulz 01:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

OWTF?!

Who the fuck keeps uploading CP?!

Should we V& them?

PræsidentMudkip 16:09, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Some pseudo intellect who thinks he is being clever.

Meepsheep

16:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

v& the fuckers. report them to the FBI. Also, How is it that every creep on the internet has CP? I mean, really, isn't this shit supposed to be hard to get?--Brxbrx 17:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

It's easier than you think.

Meepsheep

18:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

One of the reasons I go there sparingly. Fucking cp threads popping up randomly. --Brxbrx 18:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The more you care the more they will do it. You would think you guys would be experts at this shit. Just delete it and move along. --zaiger (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

???

Why so Vector?

Meepsheep

21:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Nice

I see we're now using the latest mediawiki.

PræsidentMudkip 00:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

• No that's just the default skin being changed. You can change it back by going into your prefs > appearance and change the skin to monobook. --zaiger (talk) 01:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
  • the grey was really messing with my eyes. after reading a few articles here, all whites seem grey for a bit--Brxbrx 04:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Troll, troll, troll

"Syrian lesbian blogger is revealed conclusively to be a married man." From Scotland.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/13/syrian-lesbian-blogger-tom-macmaster

I laughed. Tom Complex 07:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey, ED- this one's for you!

trolls--Brxbrx 22:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

That's surprisngly accurate. Equivamp 22:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Tennessee is offended

lol'd so hard my sides split. - Vinland 13:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Good thing ED isn't based in Tennessee. What will Tennessee-resident /b/rothers ro? Equivamp 14:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

What will I do? Give not a single fuck. --Praxlor 00:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Pomf =3

Whatever happened to the Pomf =3 article?

PræsidentMudkip 00:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I believe lulztroll had written it. He's got a version of it up on OI. How have we not recruited him yet? What could he of all people possibly find appealing about that ruinous cesspit?--Brxbrx 01:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

• • U know what fuck Lulztroll we don't need that traitor anyhow. Ill just reverse-engineer the Pomf article from OI and make modifications to it to make it more suitable for ED. Hell,I'll even try to add the entire "The Light of Tsukimi Manor" doujin for the article. I'll do the article but I need approval for the addition of the complete doujin to the article.

PræsidentMudkip 03:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

• • On another note, have we made any progress negotiating for ED's old server, than we may fully recover the content lost during the shift?--Brxbrx 01:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I doubt Girlvinyl would ever hand it over.

Meepsheep

01:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

That data is considered to have been eaten. Move along. --zaiger (talk) 03:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Speaking of lost articles, we don't have Autism macro --One With The Lulz 03:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Revival of Pomf

Ok know that the article has been built, images are badly needed for it

Anyways,is it okay if I upload the original doujin (Light of Tsukimi manor) and post the pages as a gallery on the article? I only had that idea since the ITTY BITTY BABY ITTY BITTY BOAT article has the original comic (My Wild and Raunchy Son) posted as a gallery.

PræsidentMudkip 03:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Bitcoin Drama

Guy got half a million USD in the form of 25,000 bitcoins stolen.

Adrian was first on the scene, can someone who knows about Bitcoins please write this into the article? I don't know anything about how they work. Once that is done and the article is cleaned up a bit I will put it on the front page as AOTN --zaiger (talk) 02:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I predicted this would totally happen. With bitcoin, central banking is fucked, so SOMEONE had to do something about it obviously. - Vinland 12:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I blame a lack of the gold standard. --One With The Lulz 14:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

What to do with Unused files?

One suggestion: find for duplicates, then delete some of the dupes, use the surviving pics in relevant articles. (Example: this pic is a duplicate of this pic while this can be used for the Weed article.) -YellowZombieHater (spam me) 03:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

There are around 40,095 unused files. --JuniusThaddeus 13:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

more of brxbrx being an unproductive boor

Look what I found on TOW! --Brxbrx 18:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

lolwut?

Meepsheep

18:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

pool's closed

due to gays--Brxbrx 20:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

HOLY SHIT

Read for yourself. Do we have something on Lulz Security? - Vinland 04:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13787229 Tom Complex 11:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Campaigning Irony

Mitt Romney, newcomer asshat candidate, says unemployed people can safely consider him one of them. - Vinland 23:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

     Mitt romney has some sort of serious retardation or somthing....... M R S K W I D  22:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

More offended communities

Bikinis are WRONG! - Vinland 03:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

ED.ch store

Is it a good idea for us to set up a shirt or merchandise store for this site?

PræsidentMudkip 04:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

FUCK YES. Equivamp 04:42, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

probably need more money first.--Brxbrx 10:14, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

This has been discussed a couple of times on the IRC, ofcourse everyone would like a store but atm it's to expensive or it takes up to much time. EmilyPlays 13:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

IRC

IRC is fucked up. It keeps going up and down, and the irc.Encyclopediadramatica.ch URL is not currently pointed at the server for whatever reason. Please connect by typing /server irc.lulzco.org into your client's command line. Also SSL is not working so if your client is set to automatically connect to port 6697 you are going to have to change it to 6667. If you cannot connect right away it does not mean that you are doing it wrong, it is currently down as I type this, just wait a little while and try back.

Finally, the services database has been corrupted or erased so you are going to have to reregister with services. If you need your permissions reset you can ping me. --zaiger (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Just a question

Can somebody explain me what are the different purposes of the main page talk, the TJC and the needed/proposed ? Because I don't know where to post things some times. Thank you.--Polmas 08:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

user pages from old ED?

Hello, I was "User:Myveryownsock" from the old ed. I used to have a nice browser based Wiki vandalism script in my user space and I would like to make it available to the public again, for the lulz. It was at User:Myveryownsock/vandalbot and it had a mainspace redirect at Vandalbot

Is there any way to recover it?

Shellcode 18:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

• There is no way

PræsidentMudkip 19:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Delete request

Whenever I come across Shit tier content, may it be articles or images, i try to let sysops notice this shit. This works sometimes, but not always. Can't there be a page to request the deletion of aticles and images? EmilyPlays 18:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

There probably should be one. But then again you could use something link {{baleetplz}} TKN 19:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Dramatica:Articles for Deletion

Meepsheep

19:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Meepsheep :)

• EmilyPlays 19:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh Crap, I Just Remembered Something

Back on the old ED, because they were constantly trying to ban me, I came up with this one nasty little trick I used to pull. First I would sign up with all the local dial-up ISPs, for like just a month. Most dial-up services do NOT have static IP addies, but rather variable ones, so every time you disconnect and then reconnect it'll give you a new IP addy. So basically what I did was I would create hundreds of throwaway accounts in order to force them to perma-ban...basically the whole IP ranges of entire service providers, thus preventing most of the entire town from ever being able to use ED for anything. It might be prudent to keep a close eye on the IPs of people who are getting banned, to make sure no one is attempting to block out an entire ISP from being able to edit on ED. Further it might be a good idea to utilize cookie tracking, both to hinder the use of proxy accounts as well as to hinder that nasty little trick of mine. --Onideus 22:38, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Why didn't you just say, "lol, internet", and go do that to TOW?

Meepsheep

22:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Actually I used to do it to lots of different places...as well as other little nasty tricks I won't even mention here because I don't want to give anyone any ideas. Although my favorite is the special little box we came up with on alt.2600 that can destroy the entire physical architecture of a computer network...works great when you really wanna fuck a company over directly. We also came up with interesting ways to modify those Annoy-a-tron sonic ear splitters to work off timers and by remote. --Onideus 22:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Some dialup ISPs are on TOW's list of ips not to autoblock (btw) TKN 22:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

I have been unbanning IP's after a few days and leaving the actual account banned for that specific reason, that and colleges and shit use shared IP's. --zaiger (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Also, TKN, we are talking about range blocks.

Meepsheep

22:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

kay TKN 22:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiknic

Apparently, TOW is hosting a picnic in at least 100 cities. DO you think 4chan or ebaumsworld might plan an IRL raid?

PræsidentMudkip 16:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

God I hope so. Wikipedia editors deserve nothing but hardcore trolling. --One With The Lulz 18:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Shit nigga, they be havin' one in my turf.

Meepsheep

18:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

The fuck. A wikipedo convention. And one not but an hour from me. Equivamp 19:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh shit nice there is one in Boston, anyone else going? --zaiger (talk) 03:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

there's one where I'm at, sorta. But it's in Scottsdale. That place is full of bland rich snobs. And I don't edit TOW. And I hate outings.--Brxbrx 04:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Jew court wants dog stoned

lolkikes --Kashiwaba Tomoe 20:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Merchandising

One way to generate money for the site would be to sell t-shirts, bumper stickers, mouse pads and such through a cookie cutter site like Zazzle. I know they did it on the old ED in a limited capacity (just shirts I believe), but it could be stepped up a notch. Here's some potential submissions (all of these were rejected by the Butter Queen herself at one point or another, after she found out I was the one submitting them):

--Onideus 21:57, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

I think merch would be a great thing, but none of those are ED related.

Meepsheep

00:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't necesarily have to deal with ED directly, but just lulz, memes, Internet culture and such in general. Limiting it to just ED related stuff would make it pretty difficult and constricting for artists to submit materials, wouldn't generate as many sales that way either. --Onideus 00:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Mmmm, there is one potential downside though, in that Zazzle sometimes puts a stick up their ass on certain designs, like this one I made that they removed at the request of Pepsicola: http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Graphic_Design_-_Pepsi_Generation.png

If they are not ED related, what is the point in having them in ED's store?

Meepsheep

01:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Well I guess it depends on what you mean by "ED related". I generally consider anything lulzworthy or Internet related in general to be "ED related". If you take it to mean only stuff that mentions or uses ED's name directly in the artwork, well...honestly not many people are gonna be buying the stuff...and that's the point. It's a matter of maximizing sales. --Onideus 01:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

What I am trying to say is, if we are going to have a store, it should sell similar products to those on the lollershop. Not just t-shirts with random designs.

Meepsheep

01:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

If I recall correctly, that was what the lollershop used...random designs rooted in lulz, memes and Internet culture. I don't think hardly any of them were really related directly to ED itself. It would probably be a good idea to use like categories and "featured" stuff though, that way you could make certain designs stand out in front while still making others available...again to maximize the sales. It would also technically be "ED related" in that the designs would be submitted from ED users and ED artists. --Onideus 01:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

It is actually still up if you want to see. And yes, I agree that (assuming we will launch one) ED's shirt shop should have some meme/culture related stuff, but this has no relevance to ED whatsoever.

Meepsheep

01:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Not necessarily to ED I suppose, that design is actually based on one of the first humor related images to make the rounds, back around 1995, the original has been in active circulation on the grid for nearly twenty years, almost a quarter century. A lot of stuff *IS* Internet and lulz related...but often only to specific communities, groups, subsets, etc...in this case it would be us "oldbies". It would probably be a good idea to have like descriptions saying who the submitting artists is, the nature of the design, what it's related to, etc, etc. Maybe even have like artist showcases, with the idea to breed competition and getting more people to submit designs. On the whole the more designs the better as far as making money, but like you say, there needs to be some standards and quality control as far as what's allowed and what isn't. Gotta be a bit careful though on that, otherwise you could trigger another Crystal sammich type fiasco, by rejecting something that the majority think should be allowed. Perhaps a voting system of some kind could be used? That's one idea to get around it. As well as a "justification" tag, like what we use on Usenet for new group creation, which likewise could also serve as the before mentioned description. Anyway, I'm just throwing ideas out here, not saying anything should be set in stone, there's lots of different ways it could be done really. --Onideus 01:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I am also aware of all of that, I just don't feel like those designs are ED related, but this isn't worth wasting our time arguing over.

Meepsheep

02:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not necessarily saying they are or aren't, just throwing ideas and examples out here (I just copied and pasted most of the links from my Zazzle account). A lot of them could altered and repurposed too, like the finger pointing one could be used with a caption like, "I'm With Newfag." or something like that. I'm real big on derivative works. There's a lot of real funny stuff out there that can be repurposed in new ways to make it even funnier and to make it directly ED related. Just gotta use your imagination. --Onideus 02:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

We don't even have advertising for us, why would we advertise for you (or allow you to advertise here)? --zaiger (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Wut? LOL, d00d srsly, if I was looking to advertise my stuff I would do it through my own sites, not ED. Technically at this point all my sites collectively generate more traffic than the whole of ED itself. At present my sites are churning out around $400 bucks a month in ~profit~ (after hosting costs). You want me to donate a few hundred more dollars? I see the counts been stuck at around $700 bucks for a few days now, I can go ahead and cover the rest if you like. Srsly man, talkin shit like that to a guy whose already churned out a hundred bucks in donation to keep this site afloat really does make you look like an ass. I don't need ED to make money, I *GIVE* ED money...and probably a whole shit load more than you. --Onideus 13:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes I am the one who looks like an ass here. --zaiger (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I donated five dollars. Do I get to feel good about myself now?--Brxbrx 17:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Only if someone randomly accuses you of trying to use the site for your own personal gain, all the while shelling ~out~ money to the site. Well, actually you can feel good about yourself irregardless of all that...but it will require a squirrel...and duct tape...LOTS of duct tape. *nods* --Onideus 18:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I have donated more time and money to this site than you have spent on anything ever. If you want to keep this account I would suggest shutting the fuck up and learning your role. I can see why the old staff didn't want you around, and it wasn't because they were obsessed with you as your userpage suggests. Most of the time when people don't want you around it is not because they like you, I don't think you realize that though, maybe it is due to a personality disorder or something idk. You are just not a likable person, so as I said, either become likable (by ED standards, shouldn't be that hard, if it is then you have fucking problems) or spend the rest of your ED career using sockpuppets and dodging banhammers. Your choice. --Zaig3r 05:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

If you're going to blatantly steal material that we Flonkers invented (over a fuckin decade ago) you could at least give us credit:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/a8025ff595656112

Do you even ~know~ who Rikijo is? I'm guessing not. It's too bad about Kookpedia, a lot of their material, mostly "Web 1.0" stuff, could have been ported over to ED before it went tits up. I don't think anyone archived the "Kook Kard Deck" on Petitmorte before it went tits up either. Mara's page is still up though:

http://www.whoismara.com/

And I bet you kids never even wondered where that whole PTOGTFO line came from. *snicker*

PS - I am a *VERY* likable person...but only if you've got Usenet grade "thick skin", my generation of flaming and trolling artists didn't believe in your little baby boom boom ban hammer or your coddling little mommy moderators, we believed in one thing and one thing only...survival of the fittest. You could either hack it...or you got burned. Those were your only options. As such, we Netters aren't like you Webbie kids, we're effectively flame proof. What you see as an attack, we see as an *ART FORM*. You wanna know the difference between you and me, Zaiger? You want to see where you end and I begin? Watch this...

"I, Matthew Moulton, do hereby openly admit to being a donkey raping shit eater!" :D

Your turn! He, he, he...can't do it, can you? Don't sweat it though kid, we can't all be MHM members. You just keep clutching your lil baby ban hammer for support and crying for mommy moderator every time diddums wets his lil training Pampers with indignant frustration...I would expect nothing more from someone of your...height. --Onideus 18:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Dude I'm older than you, what are you even talking about? I'm not flaming you, I just don't like you. Like you just said above, words don't work with you, so the only way I can get you to STFU is by banning you, so yeah, b&. --zaiger (talk) 06:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Icon Tags

I came up with a concept for use on one of my sites that involves tagging kooks with icons that represent the various aspects of their fagottree:

http://www.backwater-productions.net/poser-class/ (click the key icon at the bottom right)

The concept could possibly be ported over to ED, either in and of itself, or perhaps as an extension of the current "series" tags. If anyone is interested I can put up my current icon libraries for download on my server...keeping in mind though that they're not entirely sorted as of yet...and incredibly fucking huge (we're talking thousands upon thousands of icons). Or you could just use the ones I've already parted out on the link, direcly accessible here:

http://www.backwater-productions.net/poser-class/Icons/

--Onideus 01:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Mmmm, also in line with this idea, it might be fun to put together some default signature options with little icons that link to specific articles (like the one I'm using).

--Onideus 02:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I like this. I think the best place this can go in is the infobox template (the one that usually appears on the side, such as the ones most generally used for chans).

The problem however is that this is exactly what Categories are for. I'm thinking we can use the icons for categories, and find a way to associate the icons with them. - Vinland 03:10, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I like the idea ^ EmilyPlays 11:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Google goes full retard

Along with Youtube, a video revealing Google's new plans at a conference to police the internet was taken down from the front page to prevent it from going viral, after the views it got within just a few minutes of its upload. - Vinland 03:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

MAJOR UPDATE: In wake of this, we may witness a general investigation opening soon. Looks like they'll be busy hiding evidence before that happens. - Vinland 11:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

I just found an awesome website

Porn Wikileaks. Sorry if i'm a Slowpoke. --One With The Lulz 18:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

This is more ghetto than Wikifur.

Meepsheep

18:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I don't know why we don't have a page on it already, they are brutal and have caused a fair amount of drama by announcing which porn stars have GRIDS. --zaiger (talk) 18:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

The article on Jenna Haze lols me to death. --zaiger (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Seems like they don't have a page for Kirk Johnson, I better get to work on that.

Meepsheep

19:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Just noticed we do have a page on it. --One With The Lulz 19:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Damn these people hate gays. read this. Full-on "gay agenda" conspiracy shit. But yeah, the Jena Haze article is hilarious.--Brxbrx 21:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I just thought of an awesome trolling idea. How about editing the wiki articles on porn stars with their real names? We have sources, and the whole Sasha Grey incident shows porn stars get butthurt about their real names getting revealed. (a task even nigger dicks fail to accomplish) --One With The Lulz 23:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Yeah do it. Dox em all, you got the sauce. --zaiger (talk) 02:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Ryan Dunn

Ryan Dunn is motherfucking dead! He most likely died from performing his stupid stunts. Sauce.

PræsidentMudkip 02:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Lolwut? Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

Meepsheep

02:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

He died drunk driving, what a jackass. Here is a picture of what was left of his car. --zaiger (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

So Seth Putnam and Ryan Dunn died in the same month? $20 says Sal Governale is next.

Meepsheep

05:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

It's a conspiracy! Blame the illuminati! Equivamp 13:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

And the winner donates all!--Brxbrx 06:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Ryan Dunn Goof'd. --zaiger (talk) 07:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Saw this butthurt. Meanwhile, Ebert has a permanent trollface. --One With The Lulz 17:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I know, right? It's like Ebert is one of us. Whether he's making fake creationist articles or trolling on twitter, this diseased fat fuck is a lulzy troll--Brxbrx 17:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I like how Bam told him to shut his fucking mouth when he doesn't have a bottom jaw. It is a well known fact that Roger Ebert got his jaw removed so that he can fit more dicks in his mouth. --zaiger (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

He's like Malak but with some old mixed in. Equivamp 18:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Anthrocon

Not only is Wikipedia having their IRL circle jerk this weekend, the furries will be too.

Meepsheep

17:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

More conspiracies. Equivamp 18:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

fur is murder H64 19:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Ryan is v&

	“	SkyNews identified the teen as Ryan Cleary of Wickford, Essex, although police declined to identify the suspect because he has not yet been charged with a crime.	„
	—Faux Mews/yahoo

--Kashiwaba Tomoe 21:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Brandt is going to have a field day with this one.

Meepsheep

21:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

This has zero impact on the stability of the wiki, and that's all that matters. We are working to fix the server errors now. --zaiger (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Let me know if any help is needed, either money, servers/hosting...or anything else. --Onideus 05:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't wrong, the wiki stayed up the whole time. Everything else seems to be fixed as well. Thanks for your fealty. --Zaig3r 02:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

I suppose now is a bad time

Since apparently the site's founder got v&, but will we be seeing anything such as this? I think RationalWiki is a pretty good standard for financial transparency and this is somewhere the previous iteration (mostly due to DeHippo) failed. And yes, I donated, so don't flame me for that. I just think it'd be good if we could trust the site, you know?--Brxbrx 23:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

YouTube Profiteering

I put up a couple "video of the now" entries for July and shortly after I got a couple of these:

...which leads me to believe that YouTube might be specifically monitoring the "video of the now" section, looking for material that they can profit off of from the traffic generated from ED. Not just YouTube, but individuals as well might start abusing it, knowing they'll get revenue sharing opportunities by adding any old lame ass video. It might actually be better at some point in the future to directly host the "videos of the now" on ED. I've got a variety of custom Flash based video players I've put together over the years that could be adapted for the job:

http://www.backwater-productions.net/_video/video_player.swf?vid=Hellsing_Ultimate_-_Clip_1

http://www.backwater-productions.net/_video/player_-_commercial_-_carfax_bad_dog.swf

http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/Medical_Video_Player/

Or, what might be even better, is to setup a YouTube account specifically for ED, then any submissions could be downloaded with nyah:

http://keepvid.com/

And then re-uploaded to the ED account and that way ED itself would be able to get in on the profit sharing. --Onideus 18:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

What were the stats for the video prior to VOTN?

Meepsheep

18:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

About the same, I think they went up by about a couple dozen. I've gotten bigger hit surges though posting links from my MySpace page, which is part of why I think they're specifically looking at the VotN page. --Onideus 18:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

So the YouTube jews have taken interest in us. We could always have gay rape scenes from obscure indie movies for a month.

Meepsheep

18:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

That's actually pretty awesome. We're being recognized by a reliable source--link in TOW article, here we come! Equivamp 23:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

That's a shame. Most of the videos in VOTN section absolutely suck. Pretty dumb of jewtube to monitor something like that rather than quality content. I second setting up the ED account idea though to generate income for ED. Only problem with reposting vids like that for votn section would be copyright infringement notices/etc. Somehow I don't feel like it'd be long before ED account got banned. Moarhate 18:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

The ED YT account is inactive, I have no idea who;s account it actually is, but it osn't any of us. I (or one of the other admins) could create a new one though if anyone feels it is necessary. --Zaig3r 05:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Meepsheep apparently runs ED's official YouTube account. --JuniusThaddeus 11:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

All images missing on Zoroark article

Somebody needs to recover all those images on that article. Perhaps you may be able to find them on Paheal or another Rule 34-dedicated site.

PræsidentMudkip 03:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

UPDATE - Found a link : [1] I don't feel like downloading and uploading the images myself because I am strongly against furfag pr0nz on my HD.

PræsidentMudkip 03:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Sigh. I'll handle this. Equivamp 14:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

There's a mediawiki function that allows us to simply use images from commons. for example, an image I used in my sig a long while ago would not have to be uploaded. typing in [[Image:foucault5.jpg]] would transfer the image automatically, complete with the license and shit. This could really aid us in restoring the place if enabled. We have it on RationalWiki, it works fine. --Brxbrx 03:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

mw:Manual:$wgUseInstantCommons, but I don't see the point of using Commons. I don't believe that this ED or the previous replied on images from Commons. If anything, most of our images are from deviantArt and 4chan. --JuniusThaddeus 04:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

I just figured if we needed images, this would be an easy way to get some. Obviously it would not replace what's been lost, but perhaps here we could find some useful pics. Also, if we want to spruce up our arsenal of shock images, rest assured TOW will not let us down.--Brxbrx 06:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay, so I got some pictures up, but I think that's enough for now from me. I'll do some more later, but I'm sick of deleting pr0n from the computer after I upload it. Equivamp 14:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

HBGay Part 2: Electric Boogaloo

Guess the new stuff they found in those emails. - Vinland 12:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

List of fetishes

Look what I found... Could spawn some new articles, maybe? yes? No? Either way, it's interesting to see how fucked up we all are. Equivamp 14:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

I like how they consider sick fuck activities (cutting a hole in your pockets so you can fap in public) as a medical condition. --One With The Lulz 05:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

You people act as if you were shocked to find this. Wikipedia is more sexually perverse than Wikifur and 12chan combined.

Meepsheep

05:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

gay marriage in jew york

It's legal now

buttsecks for everybody

yaay!

none of you care, do you?

Gay EDiots in NYC, congrats

rainbow blinkies have never been more relevant

amirite that none of you care?

lol, I don't edit.--Brxbrx 03:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

HOLY MOTHERFUCKING SHIT BALLS! Could this lead to Fred Phelps finally coming out of the closet?

Meepsheep

03:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

ED Torrents

Since DeGreedo won't release the server, I must ask: are any of these any good? The first one is less then 400 MiB (is that the same as MB? Cuz if it is, it's not ED). I just want to know if anybody's looked at these--Brxbrx 05:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Denmark declares war on Anonymity

Associates it with terrorism. I lol'd at the comments, so much butthurt down there. - Vinland

While we're on the topic of European nanny states, I found this yesterday. --One With The Lulz 23:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Draw Mohammed every day drawing Mohammed every day drawing Mohammed. --SadMonkey 01:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Dammit, Denmark was always the envy of the world for free speech. What the hell is going wrong there? Meanwhile here there's Weev (from the banner), Aaron Swartz, new political charges all the time. Is Hong Kong really the pinnacle of human freedom? Wnt 19:29, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Moar you know

On the old wiki it rotated between a bunch of different ones, we should do that here. Anyone know how to do that? --Zaig3r 04:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

If I remember correctly:

<choose>
<option>1</option>
<option>2</option>
</choose>

produces:

1

--JuniusThaddeus 04:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Trolling on Illogicopedia

According to the deletion log on Illogicopedia,Illogicopedia admin Athyria enjoys devouring semen and penises

PræsidentMudkip 18:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

That made me laugh so hard. Equivamp 18:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I can't believe they're still around.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 20:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikinews parody

I was wondering whether we should have our own news section, but with the added bonus of ED. Basically, we can report on actual events, while still keeping our lulz and dignity, however may I suggest that we should moderate that as well or make only a few trusted bastards work on it, so it doesn't just become another fucking LJ/twitter/every other fucking social website etc. Anybody have any feedback or as I like to call it, arse raping of my shitty idea? LulzKiller 21:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

This is not Uncyclopedia Equivamp 21:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't like the idea of creating a "parody", but creating an adequacy.org-like website for mock journalists and mock columnists while remaining Web 1.0 would be awesome. Unfortunately, I suspect useless meme-spewing would be rampant. adequacy.org was good because it was smart, creative, and subtle, but I'm afraid that our news articles would be too stupid, blog-ish, and in-your-face. --JuniusThaddeus 21:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Junius. Even the Ohinternet blog would be a lot better than whatever we would put out.

Meepsheep

22:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Adequacy.org was exactly what I was thinking, however meepsheep's reply has given me a thought, not exactly for ED but, what if we ran a blog or something showing a life of a summerfag, or basically take the piss out of ourselves? I already know the answer to my question. 'That's shit too.' Many regards, sorry for being a newfag. LulzKiller 21:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Not entirely sure what you are trying to say. Can you rephrase?

Meepsheep

21:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Nothing. Was some stupid idea better off either independent or otherwise unheard. My apologies. LulzKiller 20:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Restoring "Anal Prolapse" article

The original is missing. Can someone find the best (ie. grossest) anal prolapse images and stuff them onto an article? Text isn't necessary; the visuals can speak for themselves. --JuniusThaddeus 23:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

How about just a large image of prolapse man in the center?

Meepsheep

00:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Alright, here it is: Anal prolapse. Anyone is free to add more images. --JuniusThaddeus 00:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

the wiki is about three minutes fast

What crapped up version of mediawiki are we using?--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 11:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

lol TKN 21:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

It's eight minutes "faster" in my area. -YellowZombieHater (spam me) 01:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Yup, eight minutes fast, I just checked the time stamp.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 18:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Country-specific ban template (Philippines)

Should we give it a go or not? I have a feeling that ED will be vandalized by many butthurt Filipinos once they (re-)discover those pages (Philippines, Angel Locsin, Bakla, Blackmage9). -YellowZombieHater (spam me) 01:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean they rediscovered those pages? Link? --zaiger (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

My fellow flips are more butthurt than the japs. 02:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

"Rediscovered" meaning that some butthurt flips who saw those pages when ED was under the .com domain will see or have seen those articles here (under the .ch domain). They thought that ED is gone, thanks to Sherrod's bawwwing last April. Those guys were mistaken, and ED is back for good. I also discovered that a certain flip on Twitter was offended by ED (see my sandbox) and I expect that more Flips will (re-)discover ED, vandalize pages that have something to do with the Philippines and the Sysops will have a field day in b&ning them. -YellowZombieHater (spam me) 02:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

thank you!

for bringing the site back on line. love you guys--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 18:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

But they're the ones that broke it. 18:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Kashiwaba Tomoe/Bokuchan faggotry

All links to Bokuchan and Kashiwaba Tomoe have been deleted.

PræsidentMudkip 17:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I bet Bokuchan's traffic dropped over 9000%. RIP Bokuchan ;~; --zaiger (talk) 06:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Confirmation needed

Is this legit, or is someone trying to frame Anonymous to introduce more 'internet policing'? - Vinland 17:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

the only criterion for being a part of Anonymous is being anonymous and maybe having a web connection--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 17:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Ever since Chanology, WE R LEJUN faggots think Anonymous is a hactivist group. --One With The Lulz 19:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Why don't YOU have a seat right over there, Chris Hansen?

Hidden cameras catch Chris Hansen cheating on his wife.--SadMonkey 04:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

SHE'S LEGAL, IT'S AWWWWWWRIGHT.

Meepsheep

06:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggested featured quote

"someone have written about me, on a website, called Encyclopedia Dramatica.

But that's a website, where they mirror a dramatised version of reality" (Erik Ribsskog)

While lacking in grmmarm it's true. 06:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

• Done. Thanks for the suggestion. --zaiger (talk) 06:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

YouTube-related articles

Why are they missing?

PræsidentMudkip 15:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Something to do with this fag. --One With The Lulz 15:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

lesswrong

A probable precursor to an article about them. I made a troll post, and I think I'll write about these pompous twits--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 21:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

if you want, you can make an account and rate it up, for maximum lulz--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 21:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)