Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

User talk:Kackerack: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sickpuppy
→‎Re: Mr Wiki Pro: new section
imported>Sickpuppy
→‎Re: Mr Wiki Pro: new section
(No difference)

Revision as of 12:13, 29 June 2014

welcome

Welcome, Kackerack

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

  • Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
  • To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
  • Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
  • These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
  • The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
  • Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
  • Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
  • See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

-hipcrime 03:18, 11 July 2012 (EDT)

re:

Haha looks good, I'll set it for AOTN Jun 29/30. Uberfukken 19:34, 23 June 2014 (EDT)

Cool welcome back. I agree there's too many shitty attack articles about complete nobodies, thankfully they're easy to sweep under the rug. I blame tumblr for giving these shitlords the illusion of relevancy. Uberfukken 13:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Re: Mr Wiki Pro

All new pages are monitored, judged, and placed in either GNA or BNA. The one you mentioned is in BNA at the moment (and rightfully so). All articles in there are given a grace period to be cleaned up, and they end up getting deleted if nobody ends up doing so.

That article's 3 days old, so we'll see if the author can expand it and rewrite it to be dramatic and lulzy, because at the moment it's a crappy stub that reads like a whiny vendetta.  Sickpuppy  08:13, 29 June 2014 (EDT)