Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Encyclopedia Dramatica:BLANKING IN PROGRESS: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Igglebom
blankception in progress
Cat (talk | contribs)
m Undo revision 1875158 by Hypeshot (talk)
Tag: Undo
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
\
<!-- For those who know the truth: plz do not remove the "put/putting the words:" phrases. It's part of the joke :] -Jawsome  -->
{{Policy|ED:BIP}}
[[Image:Blankfailure.gif|thumb|REVERTING IN PROGRESS]]
The phrase "''BLANKING IN PROGRESS''" is commonly used by people who have newly registered for the sole intent of blanking an article that they got all [[butthurt]] over for [[Self-aware|making]].  They find the article, hit the edit button, [[DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING|delete all text]], and put the words  ''BLANKING IN PROGRESS'' into the "edit summary" field, even though -technically- the blanking is no longer in <i>progress</i> but is '''BLANKING COMPLETE'''.
 
<big>'''Mission Accomplished.'''</big>
<br>
<br>
Unfortunately for them, the [[wiki]] saves all previous revisions, meaning that [[ED:VIP|vandalism is completely pointless]] because it can be reverted with ease, by using the [[Undo]] button, or other [[an hero|heroic]] methods.  In fact, by putting ''BLANKING IN PROGRESS'' into the "edit summary" field they have made it even '''''easier''''' for users and [[faggot|sysop]]s to spot vandalism in [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]], resulting in a faster revert or rollback.  Often enough, the [[faggot|user]] will see that their blanking has been reverted, and will try again and again.  It is unknown ''how'' someone could be so stupid as to try the same thing again to get the article removed, but then again one should never underestimate the persistent stupidity of [[teenagers]]. It has been [[some argue|commented on]] that to do the same thing repeatedly and expect the results to be different is the very definition of insanity.
 
On the other hand, a great many articles written in ED are created for the sole purpose of trying to "get back" at someone.  The best way to gauge this is by blanking or creating a new article to replace the old one.  The number of times a user tries to revert the blank one will show how important their "revenge article" is to them.  Also, the speed at which they revert the article is a good gauging factor.  While most lulz worthy articles can be blanked for months at a time before restoring, those created for revenge MUST be changed back IMMEDIATELY...otherwise there will be crying and [[Banhammer|banning]] and all sorts of e-drama.
 
Fear not though!  If you are seeking revenge and you get your attempt at retribution blanked you can always throw a tard fit and scream [[butthurt|BUTT HURTZ]]!  This of course automatically nullifies any suspicion that you're a dirty little ass goblin and you can give us all a proud-tard smile, knowing how easily you fooled all of us.
 
On and off repeated blanking will ensure being hit with the [[banhammer]] as well as having your userpage being raped with [[rainbow blinkies]], [[Template:Faggot|faggotry templates]], and if you're persistent enough, the [[Template:Dongs|dongs template]], [[kittens]], [[Template:Hugefaggot|HUGE FAGGOT]], or [[pain series]].
 
For an example, see [[Blank Article]].
== When BLANKING IN PROGRESS is Okay ==
* BLANKING IN PROGRESS [[Special:MyPage|your profile.]]
* BLANKING IN PROGRESS the [[ED:Sandbox|Sandbox]].
 
== How to BLANK IN PROGRESS on ED ==
# Find article that makes you [[butthurt]]
# [[DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING]]
# Watch as the blanked article gets reverted back to normal without anyone having seen it.
# Get [[Banhammered]]
# [[????]]
# [[PROFIT!]]
[[File:Blanking in Progress Irony.PNG|frame|center|Not really.]]
 
==How to Use This to Great Effect on Wikipedia==
 
# Find article
# Make a normal edit
# Use summary "BLANKING IN PROGRESS"
# Watch as [[Wikipedos]] shit bricks due to contradictions
# Go to Step 1 and repeat
 
==See Also==
*[[VIP]]
*[[Vandal/How-to]] - A guide on how to vandalize a wiki properly.
*[[Delete fucking everything]]
*[[Wiki]]
 
{{trolls}}
{{template:lern}}{{wikis}}
[[Category:In Jokes]]
[[Category:Edit Wars]]
[[Category:Abnormal Psych]]
[[Category:Wikis Suck]][[Category:WikiEdit Drama]][[Category:Final Solutions]]

Latest revision as of 06:43, 4 July 2024

Policy
This article defines official ED Policy.
Shortcut: ED:BIP
REVERTING IN PROGRESS

The phrase "BLANKING IN PROGRESS" is commonly used by people who have newly registered for the sole intent of blanking an article that they got all butthurt over for making. They find the article, hit the edit button, delete all text, and put the words BLANKING IN PROGRESS into the "edit summary" field, even though -technically- the blanking is no longer in progress but is BLANKING COMPLETE.

Mission Accomplished.

Unfortunately for them, the wiki saves all previous revisions, meaning that vandalism is completely pointless because it can be reverted with ease, by using the Undo button, or other heroic methods. In fact, by putting BLANKING IN PROGRESS into the "edit summary" field they have made it even easier for users and sysops to spot vandalism in recent changes, resulting in a faster revert or rollback. Often enough, the user will see that their blanking has been reverted, and will try again and again. It is unknown how someone could be so stupid as to try the same thing again to get the article removed, but then again one should never underestimate the persistent stupidity of teenagers. It has been commented on that to do the same thing repeatedly and expect the results to be different is the very definition of insanity.

On the other hand, a great many articles written in ED are created for the sole purpose of trying to "get back" at someone. The best way to gauge this is by blanking or creating a new article to replace the old one. The number of times a user tries to revert the blank one will show how important their "revenge article" is to them. Also, the speed at which they revert the article is a good gauging factor. While most lulz worthy articles can be blanked for months at a time before restoring, those created for revenge MUST be changed back IMMEDIATELY...otherwise there will be crying and banning and all sorts of e-drama.

Fear not though! If you are seeking revenge and you get your attempt at retribution blanked you can always throw a tard fit and scream BUTT HURTZ! This of course automatically nullifies any suspicion that you're a dirty little ass goblin and you can give us all a proud-tard smile, knowing how easily you fooled all of us.

On and off repeated blanking will ensure being hit with the banhammer as well as having your userpage being raped with rainbow blinkies, faggotry templates, and if you're persistent enough, the dongs template, kittens, HUGE FAGGOT, or pain series.

For an example, see Blank Article.

When BLANKING IN PROGRESS is Okay

How to BLANK IN PROGRESS on ED

  1. Find article that makes you butthurt
  2. DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING
  3. Watch as the blanked article gets reverted back to normal without anyone having seen it.
  4. Get Banhammered
  5. ????
  6. PROFIT!
Not really.

How to Use This to Great Effect on Wikipedia

  1. Find article
  2. Make a normal edit
  3. Use summary "BLANKING IN PROGRESS"
  4. Watch as Wikipedos shit bricks due to contradictions
  5. Go to Step 1 and repeat

See Also

BLANKING IN PROGRESS is part of a series on

Trolls

Visit the Trolls Portal for complete coverage.

BLANKING IN PROGRESS
is part of a series on
LERNIN 2 INTERNET

Pitfalls:

AspierationsBLANKING IN PROGRESSCharming NaïvetéDelete fucking everythingDOIN IT RONGEdginessFailing itInternet tough guyKids on the internetLegal actionLiberalismMental illnessMod SassSkript kiddiesSob StoriesTrollsUnrealistic ExpectationsUnwarranted Self-ImportanceWaaaambulance

Previous Hiscores:
AnimaljailApplemilk1988Cheryl ShumanDalhuskyFlardoxHal TurnerLittleCloudOnigojirakaijuPrince JeremyScience PiratesScientologySokiTwopawSweet EvaPeppermintPattiPoeticironyXxPrincessPunkxxZeriara

PROTIPS:
ARCHIVE FUCKING EVERYTHINGAn heroGoing Back To GaiaLURKING MOARProtect fucking everythingShutting The Fuck UpStopping posting

[SubmitEdit]
BLANKING IN PROGRESS is a part of a series on Wikis
Wikimedia

Italian WikipediaRussian WikipediaSiberian WikipediaSimple WikipediaVolapükWikipediaWikiversityWikivoyageWiktionary

Wikia

Animated Foot Scene WikiGTA Myths WikiIdeaWikiLostpediaSonic News NetworkStar Wars Fanon WikiWikialityWikia SearchWookieepediaSquirtage Wiki

Miraheze

Closing Logos WikiFicreationReception wikis

POV

CitizendiumConservapediaEncycMetapedia.orgOrthodoxWikiRationalWikiSJWikiA Storehouse of KnowledgeWikinfo

Lulz & Trolls

Bad Webcomics WikiEncyclopædia DramaticaThe LURKMORE wikiLurkmore.ru

Unfunny

InciclopediaIllogicopediaKamelopediaSickipediaUncyclopediaWickerpediaFun Shitposting Wiki

Miscellaneous

Bad Webcomics WikiBoobpediaBoyWikiBulbagardenCountervandalism.orgCreate Your Own StoryDeletionpediaEditthis.infoFan HistoryKnow Your Meme / ROCKETBOOMMeatballWikiOutskirts Battle DomeSCP FoundationSpanking Art WikiSteal This WikiTV TropesWikiAnswersWikiFurWikiHowWikiLeaksWikimapiaWikipornoWikiWikiWebWipipediaWP:DAILYMAIL

Dead

Anti-Encyclopedia Dramatica.comBeeripediaCheat Code WikiChristopediaCrinklepediaDickipediaEncyclopedia of StupidEncyclopediadramatica.wikiFailcyclopediaIAmTheWalrusWikiLurkMoarpediaOhInternetOrainpartyvan.infoPorn Wiki LeaksRightpediaThe Hidden WikiTrendpediaUltraviolet News NetworkVeropediaWikichanWikitruthWhatPort80

People

AediotAngela Beesley StarlingErik MöllerFast EddieGalaxyRailways2199GirlvinylGreenReaperJimbo WalesLarry SangerMar9122MarioMario456MikemikevNate SpidgewoodSeunghwan Leewillg8686Zenny

Wiki Concepts

AutoplayArticleBLANKING IN PROGRESSDouble redirectEdit warMinor editNamefaggingPreviewRandom pageRedirectRed linkUndoWikicideWikistressWriting yourself into an article