Encyclopedia Dramatica talk:ED vs. Wikipedia

update

Should this shit be updated? Tigercommander 06:44, 10 January 2015 (EST)

Misinformation?

We here try to tell accurate stuff, that you are certainly not allowed to put on wikipedia because they keep rambling over the "NPOV", "not truth", etc.

"Humorous misinformation" should be changed to something else, what you think? Contactss 06:42, 13 June 2015 (EDT)

propaganda? dangerous misinformation? that's all i got at the moment. :/ -hipcrime 21:29, 13 June 2015 (EDT)

Some info is accurate, but it's a minority. "Expect blatant, biased lies, and expect boring truths to get deleted quickly," because it's more fun that way. —  VX  22:01, 13 June 2015 (EDT)

indeed, but with Wikipedia, truth is stranger/lulzier than fiction, especially recently with Cavalry being busted for abusing Wikipedia to affect an election. some of the details i added need to be looked at by someone more familiar with UK politics, but for now it's fine. :^) -hipcrime 23:29, 13 June 2015 (EDT)

Just read again, it says "Dull, boring misinformation" for Wikipedia, which is good. No wonder why this page is so protected. ROFL. Thanks all for chiming in. Contactss 05:15, 15 June 2015 (EDT)